api
caching
ai_generated
true
If-None-Match always misses — weak vs strong ETag comparison
ID: api/etag-weak-vs-strong-comparison
82%Fix Rate
85%Confidence
4Evidence
2023-01-01First Seen
Version Compatibility
| Version | Status | Introduced | Deprecated | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| any | active | — | — | — |
Root Cause
Server returns weak ETag W/ but client uses strong comparison, so conditional requests always miss.
genericWorkarounds
-
88% success Use If-None-Match with weak comparison as specified in RFC 7232
Pass the full W/ value as-is
-
80% success Request strong ETag from server via Cache-Control or API option
Some APIs support ?strong_etag=true
Sources: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/ETag
Dead Ends
Common approaches that don't work:
-
Strip W/ prefix before comparing
85% fail
Stripping W/ converts a weak ETag to strong; they have different semantics per RFC 7232
-
Use If-Match instead of If-None-Match with weak ETags
90% fail
If-Match requires strong comparison by spec; weak ETags will always fail