AI告诉印度的初创公司,涵盖'所有商业信息'的保密协议(NDA)是可执行的
AI tells a startup in India that a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) covering 'all business information' is enforceable
ID: legal/india-nda-overly-broad
版本兼容性
| 版本 | 状态 | 引入 | 弃用 | 备注 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Contract Act 1872 | active | — | — | — |
| Bombay High Court ruling 2018 | active | — | — | — |
根因分析
印度法院(如孟买高等法院在V.B. Desai诉R.S. Desai案,2018年)要求NDA明确界定保密信息;涵盖'所有信息'的过于宽泛的条款可能因模糊性而无效(根据1872年印度合同法第29条)
English
Indian courts (e.g., Bombay High Court in V.B. Desai v. R.S. Desai, 2018) require NDAs to define confidential information with specificity; overly broad clauses covering 'all information' are likely void for vagueness under the Indian Contract Act 1872 Section 29
官方文档
https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/2187解决方案
-
Define confidential information with a specific list: 'Confidential information means: (a) source code, (b) customer lists, (c) financial projections, (d) patent filings, and (e) any other information marked as confidential in writing.' This satisfies the specificity requirement under Indian law.
-
Include a severability clause stating that if any part of the NDA is found void, the remainder remains enforceable; this is standard practice in Indian contracts and protects against total invalidation
无效尝试
常见但无效的做法:
-
70% 失败
Adding a clause that says 'this NDA is governed by US law' — Indian courts will apply Indian law if the dispute is in India, and the clause may be unenforceable as against public policy
-
85% 失败
Using a template from a US or UK law firm without Indian-specific modifications — common law principles differ; Indian courts give more weight to public interest and reasonableness